It was clear in the past that banks’ payment systems needed to
be connected to creating long-term value, to performance achieved
throughout an entire business cycle, and not to next quarter’s
profit, with the view on bonuses to change in Romania, as well,
bankers say.
The Supervisory Boards, which represent a bank’s shareholders,
decide the level of bonuses granted to top management teams.
“Bank executives received bonuses because they achieved the targets
set by the Supervisory Boards. Nobody prevented members of the
board from setting long-term targets, and from basing bonuses on
them, they were free to do it but, pressured by shareholders,
analysts and investment funds, they rushed to achieve short-term
results,” says Steven van Groningen, president of Raiffeisen
Bank.
He says the modification of bonus systems within international
banking groups will not have a major effect in Romania, where
bonuses were not very significant.
Rasvan Radu, chief executive of UniCredit Tiriac, says the view on
bonuses will change when Romanian banks change, and that it will be
increasingly connected to the bank’s performance, and even to that
of the group it is a part of.
“A bonus needs to reflect the bank’s longer-term performance. Just
as major profit rises and of the credit portfolio are now a thing
of the past, the salary increases of the last few years are no
longer a present-day concern, either.”
In the Western world, a heated debate has been going on for several
months now on the levels reached by bankers’ earnings and on the
risks of such practices continuing despite the crisis not being
over, as several large banks only survived thanks to the capital
injections they received from governments.
Bonuses also peaked in the Romanian banking system in 2008, when
many heads of banks were rewarded for the spectacular business
growth achieved in 2007, with bonuses even exceeding the annual
salary in some cases.
For instance, the entire executive management team of Raiffeisen
received a “performance bonus” whose value was not made public,
after 2007 was considered by majority shareholder Raiffeisen
International as “the best in its 10-year history of presence on
the market,” when the Romanian subsidiary posted an over 94
million-euro profit.
ZF English
Crisis will slash Romanian bankers' bonuses, as well
It was clear in the past that banks' payment systems needed to be connected to creating long-term value, to performance achieved throughout an entire business cycle, and not to next quarter's profit, with the view on bonuses to change in Romania, as well, bankers say.